How we choose motions
A motion is the statement that participants argue for or against in a debate.
We choose motions to help people practise public speaking, develop confidence, test arguments and disagree respectfully. Choosing a motion creates an opportunity for discussion. It does not make the statement our policy.
How we choose a motion
We consider a motion’s current relevance and its value as a public-speaking exercise. We look for:
clear wording
a manageable scope
a fair opportunity to argue either side
Topics may be controversial. Controversy alone is not a reason to exclude a motion.
We consider whether the wording supports constructive disagreement and whether the session can be chaired responsibly. We do not approve wording that targets participants for humiliation or invites harassment.
Political neutrality
Our educational events may cover political issues. We do not operate as a political party, political campaigning organisation or vehicle for party-political campaigning.
We do not use the debate programme to promote a political party or campaign. We do not choose motions to advance an organiser’s political commitments.
Event publicity must remain neutral. It must not present either side as our preferred answer. Motions, arguments and audience results must not be presented as our views or endorsements.
Speakers may argue positions they do not personally hold.
When debates take place
We schedule motions according to their current relevance, preparation needs and place within a varied programme.
We consider:
participants’ availability
accessibility
whether we have the capacity to chair the session responsibly
recent events that may make the timing particularly sensitive
We publish the motion and event information early enough for people to prepare and decide whether to attend. We review the programme as a whole to offer a range of subjects and perspectives.
We do not use the timing or publicity of an event to support a political campaign.
We may reconsider, reword or postpone a motion if circumstances change or we cannot deliver the event responsibly. We notify registered participants promptly of significant changes.
Content warnings and taking part
Every event listing will include a short content warning. It will identify the topic and any sensitive themes we can reasonably foresee, so people can make an informed choice about attending.
For debates, we publish the warning alongside the motion and repeat it briefly at the start. We do not rely only on a general statement that the topic may be controversial.
You may:
listen without speaking
decline a speaking role
take a break
leave without explaining why
A content warning does not replace responsible motion selection, accessible delivery or our conduct rules. We must still address concerns about discrimination, harassment or safeguarding.
What audience votes mean
In our practice debates, the audience decides which side made the more persuasive case.
The vote assesses the arguments and speeches presented. It is not a factual verdict on the motion or an endorsement by the club.
Persuasiveness includes:
clear reasoning
effective explanation
relevant support
responses to opposing arguments
Audience members may take the quality of evidence into account.
The chair must explain the basis for voting before the debate. Debate voting is separate from formal Society decisions.
Honest participation
Members must participate honestly and constructively.
Speakers must not knowingly invent evidence or misrepresent sources. They must distinguish established facts, opinions and hypothetical examples.
Practice debates develop public-speaking skills. They do not certify disputed claims as true.
Concerns and decision records
You can raise concerns about a motion’s wording, timing or delivery through the routes in our Constitution. These include contacting the Secretary or an Executive Officer who has no conflict of interest in the matter.
We consider concerns on their merits. We acknowledge the concern, explain the educational purpose and review any specific risk. Describing an event as a debate does not, by itself, resolve a concern.
The Society Committee, or an organiser acting within their delegated authority, should record:
the motion
why it was chosen
the reason for its timing
the content warning
any changes made after review

