“This House would always put the accessibility of buildings ahead of heritage.”

The motion puts inclusive access above protecting historic fabric. Supporters say equal access is a right and step-free routes, lifts and clear wayfinding should proceed even if listed features go, citing legal duties and broad social benefit. Opponents reject “always,” argue for proportionality and case-by-case design, and warn of irreversible loss, high cost and weaker authenticity. The live issues are necessity, viable alternatives, value for money and decision-making authority.